Whose Date Right Correct Young Earth Creationism Jewish New Year Rosh Hashana 5773 Creation Week World Universe Days Six Thousand Years Ago Irish Bishop Ussher Timeline Dispute Seder Olam Rabah

Here now the Jewish New Year 5773 since the six days of creation, many wonder why Bishop Ussher reckoned 4004 b.c. for the creation, he having counted back time linkages in the generations back to Adam and Eve, accurate reckoning actually, because within the millennia between the creation and today, the book Seder Olam Rabah written circa 300 a.d. compresses jewish history from the time of Daniel to the time of Jesus’ incarnation, death, and resurrection, by over two hundred years.

You don’t need to ponder long why Jews against Jesus circa 300 a.d. would want it seem that Jesus did not fulfil the Daniel 9 prophetic chronology that he would be on earth when he was, so probably only that is the reason that the Jewish New Year 5773 differs significantly from the studious Bishop Ussher’s 6,000 years ago, now see the big picture here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Fathers Modern Geology Christians Who Believed Bible Young Earth Creationism Nicholas Steno Law Sedimentary Rock Strata Superposition Antonio Snider Pellegrini Continental Drift Plate Tectonics

Christian young earth creationists Nicholas Steno and Antonio Snider Pellegrini were the fathers of modern geology, the uniformitarian geology of gradualism which would comport with darwinism later proposed  by James Lyell then Charles Hutton to explain the geologic record en lieu of the catastrophism clearly evident in geology (http://globalflood.org).

Steno established the law of superposition in geology, that shallower layers of sedimentary material are younger than deeper ones, unless subsequent tectonic activity has folded the strata such that the older appears younger, his notion predicated on biblical Noah’s Flood when the sedimentary material was laid down, then Lyell and Hutton chose to see no flood there, claiming instead it happened slowly over billions of years.

Pellegrini first fostered the notion of continental drift, plate tectonics, that crustal movement rapidly accelerated through the flood year when the supercontinent Pangea broke apart to move to roughly today’s continental configurations, now only moving slowly an inch or two per year, this rate projected billions of years back by the uniformitarians when but Pangea is said to have broken apart ‘only’ 90 million years ago!  See history after Noah’s Flood, http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Why How Do Can Young Earth Creationists Think Say Universe Cosmos Six Thousand Years Old Big Bang Theory Contradiction Bounded Unbounded Universe

Little known to the general public is that theorists of the Big Bang must predicate that the matter of the universe if bounded, because it all began at a point, the matter having expanded away from that point, so there must be a bound to matter’s edge, yet in their calculations, they sadly incorporate the assumption that the universe is boundless, without end.

You may ask why they calculate with the contradictory boundless universe template, the reason being perhaps that if they would calculate with the bounded universe template, the stars would be only thousands of years of age, due to gravitational time dilation during the creation week actually.  See the history of the earth here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

History Rome Latium Latin Language Indo European Group Timeline Italian Word Atalya Italia Atlantis Link Table Nations Etruscans Peleg Migrations Aeneid

When Aeneus arrived in Italy from Troy circa 1100 b.c., he was greeted by Latinus, said to have been the founder of the Latin language and kingom in central Italy, yet the kingdom obviously had long preceded this Latinus, the kingdom long established when Aeneus arrived with his semitic language Pelasgian, which would become Etruscan.

Linguists say that Indo European, Latin one of those, had spread from western Asia, they say about nine thousand years ago, French, Italian, and Portuguese offshoots from Latin, so Latinus of Latium circa 1100 b.c. was clearly a namesake of the original Latinus about a thousand years before, no connecton in his lineage yet made to the Table of Nations, but the archaeology falls in line, http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

And when you consider that Italia derives from ancient Atalya, the eastern extreme of the Atlantean empire, Atalya the Latin name for Atlantis, the connection of ice age Italy which ended actually circa 1500 b.c. to the Table of Nations is made more clear, submerged ruins of the Latins in several locations off the coast of Italy bearing testimony to the chronology of the Genesis timeline, Latin a japhetic language.

History Science Geology Evidence Noah’s Flood Ancient Observations Fossil Record Sedimentary Rocks Proof Global Deluge Bible Book Genesis

Geology, geo logy, means earth logic, the study of the earth, the ancients having noted the great variety of creatures entombed in the rock strata indicating evidence of the global flood which was a worldwide legend among the tribes, the word fossil derived from the ancient indo european latin verb fossili (meaning to dig up).

The flood is proven by the 95% of the creatures in the fossil record are marine creatures, with the vast majority of the rest terrestrial insects, of course in addition the vast mats of vegetation which would be compressed into coal at the close of the flood, even carbon 14 in coal proving the date timeframe for the flood (see http://globalflood.org).  After the flood see http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Supercontinent Pangea Timeline Chronology Age Earth Mountain Range Orogenies Plate Tectonics Proof Noah’s Flood Date Sequence Fossil Record

The archaic supercontinent Pangea is said to have begun separating ninety million years ago, so how were mountains formed during the ostensible four billion years preceding that time when for instance the Himalayas began to uplift because the India Plate crashed into the Asia Plate when Pangea was separating (see http://globalflood.org)?

And if somehow mountains were forming during the ostensible billions of years of Pangea, then where is the evidence of their existence in the geologic record?  There should be eroded roots of archaic mountain ranges in the geologic record where ‘though there are none.  The mountain ranges rose in catastrophic fashion, the fossil record from that sedimentary event here http://detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html.

Ontological Argument Young Earth Creationism Bible Biblical Inerrancy Probabilities Prophecies Fulfilled Historical Accuracy History Book Science Archaeology Genesis Veracity Foundation Ancient Humankind Age Stone Text Hunter Gatherers Farmers Old Testament

When you now consider that humans supposedly evolved from monkey ancestors four million years ago, yet farming has been practiced for only several millennia, you can see the absurdity of the darwinian timeline and function, having us believe that hunter/gatherers wandered around for hundreds of millions of years never bothering to more efficiently gather by planting nor building structures to achieve economic efficiencies.

Looking at the region of the Bible lands, you can see ruins of cities now stranded in deserts and “stone age” relicts throughout, both from the Ice Age when what now are deserts were lush with pastures and stands of forest, streams and shallow lakes, when agriculture was practiced ‘though not needing manmade irritgation, necessitated several centuries after the end of the Ice Age such as the extensive irrigation works added for the success of iron age Babylon.

The cause of the Ice Age could have been for only one reason when you honestly analyze the situation hydrologically, for the dense cloudcover for the Ice Age, much more evaporation must have risen off the ocean which must have been warmer, having been heated from below, the Ice Age having lasted as long as the ocean took to cool to about today’s average temperature, see much more here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Young Earth Creationism Comments Supernatural Catastrophic Noah’s Flood Mythical Event Geologic Evidence What Caused Deluge Astronomical Reasons Meteor Shower Exploded Planet Orbits Astronomy Bible Book Genesis Origins Cosmos Earth Universe

Noah’s Flood could be and oftern is called a supernatural event in that it was castastrophic, like none before nor since, yet it was natural in that an expoded planet between the orbits of Jupiter and Mercury caused meteor showers which probably set off the runaway tectonic plate movements during the flood year, one legend from India that a planet appeared in the sky, was soon as big as an elephant, then hit the earth beginning the Flood of Manu, which was Noah’s Flood.

The geologic column actually bears stark testimony to that catastrophe caused by the exploded  planet, the flood caused sedimentary layers of the earth covering entire continents with many billions of mostly marine creatures entombed therein, clear evidence that the ocean had been up on the continents, the mountains risen at the close of the flood, what the geology actually indicates when examined with unbiased eyes.

Ancient flood legends abound in most all ancient cutures, of a flood which covered the whole world, so what are the odds that all the ancient world knew of the global flood if it were not true?  Just because bibliophobic geologists don’t look at the geologic column seeing the flood does not mean it’s not the case, and when challenged to debate, the uniformiarian advocates avoid debating creationists at all costs.  See much more here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Why Reasons Darwinism Darwinian Science Evolution Valid Hypothesis Must Be True Necessity Desperation Explanation Biological Origin Species Only Alternative Theory Biblical Kinds Young Earth Creationism Bible New System Book Genesis Classification Syngameons

For darwinism to be true, as we all know (from the propaganda shoved down our throats), a primordial soup of chemicals for some unknown reason transformed into single cell living creatures, and those then into insects, then those into clams, fish, snails and such, then amazingly on into reptiles then mammals then humans, from goo to you as we like to say, certainly hard to believe!  So they call that rational science?

With this flimsy hypothesis dreamed up by Charles Darwin now openly mocked by hundreds of millions of people, many scientists even admitting the whole thing seems far-fetched indeed, without any actual scientific basis, you wonder why the scientific community clings so doggedly to this thesis clearly destined for the dust bin of history, yet when the only alternative is creationism, the Bible’s account with syngameons (biblical kinds) of animals, you can understand why the bibliophobes cast as mythology the biblical account of history.

Darwin’s term species is meaningless genetically, for instance camels, llamas, and alpacas, differing species, are all interfertile, proving that they came from a common ancestor, such that only about 20,000 syngameons of animals need have been on Noah’s Ark, this fact little known by most darwinists, and perhaps never discussed by those who do know, at least among those who remain irrationally bibliophobic.

Also not discussed amongst the uniformitarian darwinists is that Noah’s Flood did not cover the mountain ranges, because they rose at the close of the flood while the new ocean basins sank to receive the floodwater which slid off when the mountain ranges rose and the continents were buoyed up by plastic flow of the molten mantle material below, solid science, see http://globalflood.org, and to see how ancient history after the flood really unfolded, checkout http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Greek Roman Legends Myths Dragons Dinosaurs India Middle East Historians Homer Aelian Philostratus Life Apollonius Tyana Pliny Sea Gods Monsters Indian Old Accounts Alexander Great Travels Indus River Valley Region Lore Stories Dinosaurs Historical Records

Wouldn’t you agree that “dinosaurs” in human history is a real problem for darwinism, quite the game changer?  The great multitude of accounts of humans coexisting with dragons throughout history have been relegated to the realm of mythology or the morning-after a long night-on-the-town by darwinists who can’t handle “dinosaurs” in human history, but they have to explain away all the historical records, a tall order indeed.

Refer http://www.theoi.com/Thaumasios/DrakonesIndikoi.html, accounts by Pliny, Homer, Aelian, and Philostratus, all describing “dinosaurs” in India, often in great detail, and note that Alexander the Great was very anxious to see the dragons known to the people of India, he certainly acknowlegding the reality that dragons coexisted with humans.  The Bible refers to Bel the Dragon in Babylon circa 500 b.c., and Behemoth in the Jordan river from the book of Job circa 2000 b.c., all made up too?

Hundreds of stories of dragons (dinosaurs) and humans in history plague the darwinists, yet they stubbornly stand insisting it’s all mythology, now is that intellectual honesty?  And if those accounts are bogus, then why believe the rest of the history recorded by those ancient writers?  See http://genesispark.com, to see that all this fits into the biblical model, remembering that soft cell tissues of dinosaurs has  been discovered in buried bones said to be at least 65 million years old, so who’s purveying the mythology?  Help us http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.