Reason Bible God’s Curse Canaan Son Ham Who Were Canaanites Nations Where Geography Condemnation How Offspring Children Youngest Son Grandson Noah Travels Progeny Canaan Sin Sian China Sidon Atlantis Heth Hittites Jebusites King Jebu Jerusalem History

July 31, 2012

Elohim cursed Ham’s youngest son Canaan because Ham unmercifully had mocked the usually well-behaved Noah in his drunken nakedness, Canaan the youngest son cursed for reasons really known only to Elohim, however, when Joshua conquered the land of Canaan circa 1400 b.c., the Holy Land , it was wicked beyond compare, so omniscent Elohim’s plans worked it concert with history, no great surprise there certainly.

Yet many of the sons of Canaan had moved far away from the Holy Land long before Joshua would conquer it, for instance Sidon having sailed far west to help found Atlantis, his name “immortalized” as Posidon by the Libyans then the Greeks, and another son of Canaan, Sin, namesake of Mount Sinai (northwest Arabia actually Jebel Lawz), was a founder of the earliest Chinese, having migrated far to the east, he the namesake of the city Si’ an, and Sianking, Qin, and then China.

So the curse fell totally on those who remained in the Holy Land, during the Ice Age actually (see, the others such as another son of Canaan too, Heth, namesake of the Hittites, having blended with other nations away from the Holy Land, those who remained there having grown to practice unspeakable wickedness such as the burning of babies at the altar of Moloch, arousing the wrath of Elohim who meted out his justice at the hand of Joshua with the Hebrew army.

When the Jews finally conquered the city of Jebus, king of the Jebusites (another canaanite tribe), that city previously know as Salem until Shem (Melchizedek) died there, it was not the “City of Peace” as it was when Shem had ruled there, but was controlled by the Canaanites, the Israelites then coming to take control and name it Jerusalem, the coup-de-grats of Elohim’s curse on Canaan, his offspring who had migrated away spared that judgment on the progeny of Ham’s youngest son who had remained in the Holy Land to cultivate their unthinkable wickedess.

Who Name Real Historical Person Etymology Roman Word Sea God Poseidon Pelasgian Atlantean Netuns Neptune Atlas Hercules Etruscan Hero Ercle History Atlantis Mediterranean Records Biblical Characters Origin Old Book Bible Genesis Veracity Foundation

July 29, 2012

The history of legendary Atlantis was known to the people of various languages throughout the Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic.  Ancient japhetic language speakers such as the Tartessians (Tarshish) of Spain recalled Atlas, the strong man who figuratively held the world on his shoulder, Atlas known as Ercle (Hercules) to the Etruscans of Italy, who were descendants of the shemitic speaking Pelasgians, lineage of Peleg.

Plato wrote that Poseidon was the father of Atlas, Poseidon who was the canaanitic Sidon east from Canaan, and to the pelasgian Etruscans he was known as Netuns, later the god Neptune of the Romans, and namesake of Tunisia.  All these solid lineages and languages from the biblical Table of Nations in Genesis 10, the template with which to truly understand the ancient world, the biblical account ‘though said to be nonsense by the academic elites who however are clearly bibliophobic.

Legends abound that the sea level prodigiously rose engulfing much land, the Flood of Ogyges for instance, the same as the Flood of Dardanus, those kings certainly known to have lived when the so-called bronze age transitioned to the iron age, and Plato mentions kings who lived at that time too, Erectheus, Cecrops, Theseus, and Erysichthon, whom he said lived in the timframe that Atlantis went under, clearly in contradiction of his date 9600 b.c. that Atlantis was flooded.

Now can it be more obvious that the Ice Age began to end circa 1500 b.c., confirmed by all those legends?  That was the time when North Africa began to turn to desert, when the “aqualithic” period there began to end, and as Plato wrote in his Atlantis rendering, streams which abounded in archaic Greece dried up, confirmed by over 300 bronze age sites having been discovered next to anciently dried up streams, from the time when Plato said vast forests and rich pastures covered Greece, read much more here

Structure Scientific Revolutions Paradigm Shift Data Thomas Kuhn Darwinism New Old Norms Historical Science Book Course Studies Analysis History Harvard University Human Transformation Intellectual Battle Challenge Genesis Veracity Foundation Biblical Model

July 27, 2012

The norm in scientific thought about the geological history of the earth and its biology shifted to uniformitarian darwinism in the early 1900’s, when biblical history began to be scoffed at by most of the academic elites, yet now, with Atlantis being presented true history, and well known that “dinosaurs” coexisted with humans, plus geology of catastrophism agreed predominant in the geologic record, and Darwin’s term species of no classification value genetically, the tide is turning, the light is coming on, another paradigm shift is on the way, back to the biblical model.

Thomas Kuhn wrote in his book The Structure of Scienctic Revolutions that evidence against the existing scientific norm mounts until the point is reached when the superior model challenging the existing norm wins the day, when scientists and historians no longer doubt the superiority of the model challenging the norm, which is what we are seeing today, many biologists admitting darwinism is foolish, and geologists now coming to understand that almost all the geologic record is catastrophic in nature, caused by biblical Noah’s Flood (see

Although christian pastors claiming to believe all of the Bible have not much helped to force critical thinking on these issues to the world, the information is being disseminated, without much challenge from the darwinian establishment, because they know their model is so drastically inferior to the biblical model that they sheepishly refuse to debate young earth creationists, while you would certainly think they’d be eager to do so with much of the world now doubting their paradigm in ever increasing numbers.  Join in the fun, refer to all your friends and associates, and let the debates begin!

Greek Roman Legends Myths Dragons Dinosaurs India Middle East Historians Homer Aelian Philostratus Life Apollonius Tyana Pliny Sea Gods Monsters Indian Old Accounts Alexander Great Travels Indus River Valley Region Lore Stories Dinosaurs Historical Records

July 27, 2012

Wouldn’t you agree that “dinosaurs” in human history is a real problem for darwinism, quite the game changer?  The great multitude of accounts of humans coexisting with dragons throughout history have been relegated to the realm of mythology or the morning-after a long night-on-the-town by darwinists who can’t handle “dinosaurs” in human history, but they have to explain away all the historical records, a tall order indeed.

Refer, accounts by Pliny, Homer, Aelian, and Philostratus, all describing “dinosaurs” in India, often in great detail, and note that Alexander the Great was very anxious to see the dragons known to the people of India, he certainly acknowlegding the reality that dragons coexisted with humans.  The Bible refers to Bel the Dragon in Babylon circa 500 b.c., and Behemoth in the Jordan river from the book of Job circa 2000 b.c., all made up too?

Hundreds of stories of dragons (dinosaurs) and humans in history plague the darwinists, yet they stubbornly stand insisting it’s all mythology, now is that intellectual honesty?  And if those accounts are bogus, then why believe the rest of the history recorded by those ancient writers?  See, to see that all this fits into the biblical model, remembering that soft cell tissues of dinosaurs has  been discovered in buried bones said to be at least 65 million years old, so who’s purveying the mythology?  Help us

Reasons Evidence Examples Archaeological Scientific Bias Science Darwinian Paradigm Shift Who How First When America Discovered Settled Sea Atlantic Pacific Ocean Voyages Crossings Proof Before Christopher Columbus Ancient Maps Sea Kings Ice Age Navigation

July 27, 2012

Almost everybody except the textbook writers know that Christopher Columbus was certainly not the first mariner to have sailed across the ocean to the Americas.   From the Sinclair brothers with the Zeno Maps in the 1300’s to Nova Scotia (New Scotland), to the Vikings, to St. Brendan the Navigator circa 700 a.d., back to the Romans in South America, and on back to the Hebrews, Canaanites, and Libyans in North America, and the Shang mariners having helped found the ancient Olmec civilization in Mesoamerica, these all surely proven to have sailed to the Americas even millennia before Columbus, unthinkable to the darwinists.

So why is this overwhelming evidence ignored by mainstream academia?  It’s because they want us to believe that all the people in the Americas when Columbus arrived were descendants of cavemen who had crossed the landbridge between Siberia and Alaska during the Ice Age, for if they admit transoceanic navigation millennia before Columbus, then they would be forced to admit that the Table of Nations in the Bible can explain the peopling of all the world within centuries, thus destroying their darwinian paradigm, rendering the Bible the true history which it is.

The ancient Mexicans said that their ancestors had sailed from across the eastern ocean, their sea god Atlanteoltl, and Olmec statues look distinctly oriential, Shang dynastry of China; there are Libyan, Ogham, Hebrew, and Canaanite scripts etched in stone in many locations of North America, yet all ignored by mainstream academics, it’s a travesty.  And now we even know how the ancients navigated precisely, by measuring time, the slow wobble rate of the earth’s axis against the backdrop of the stars explained here, so please inform the ignorant “elites,” now hiding from the truth.

Mystery Reason Why Babylonians Used Sexagesimal Number Systems Degrees Circle Geometry Pi Value Radius Calculations Great Pyramid’s Giza Precession Nautical Miles Mapping System Astrololgy Numerology Mythology Biblical Basis Genesis Veracity Foundation

July 26, 2012

Every wonder whether there’s a linkage between the ancient Babylonians’ mysterious base sixty counting system and our modern base sixty nautical mile mapping system with sixty arc seconds and sixty arc minutes to the scheme?  Of course the nautical mile mapping system is based on circles of the earth of 360 degrees, so when you realize that the base sixty of the Babylonians’ represents one side of a six-sided polygon (hexagon) equal to the length of the radius of a circle which circumscribes said hexagon, that is how they measured the earth, by the precession rate of the earth’s axis ‘though, not by the measure of  solar transit time measured today.

See the simple arthithmetic and astronomy of the ancient method here where you’ll fully understand exactly why geometry means earth measure, as Eratosthenes was certainly not the first to meausre the earth, he having measured it actually quite badly by solar transit time and shadows, the much more ancient method responsible for the accuracy of the Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings (see the book by Charles Hapgood) and the bastard “science” of astrology, worshipping the creation rather than the Creator, the benevolent Creator who designed the earth’s wobble rate such that early humankind could measure the world.

Creationist News Website Answers Genesis Veracity Foundation Updates Biblical History Media Coverage Blackout Christian Pastors Reluctance Embrace Young Earth Creationism Reasons Believe Full Gospel Bible Science Hebrew Lineage Jesus Christ Jewish Messiah

July 25, 2012

Now attracting 8,000,000 unique visitors per day from all over the world, the creationist website is surely a hot topic in many people’s internal dialogue, yet not much discussion of the material on the web to this point, quite amazing, but then again not really, considering christian pastors by-and-large have not embraced young earth creationsim to make the book of Genesis come alive from its current status in many circles as just some quaint mythology.

However, the material is unassailable intellectually, witness the lack of skeptics at the Facebook page of the foundation, the skeptics knowing they don’t have an academic leg to stand on, so believers of all the Bible please go forth into chat-rooms boldly with “the science of the future, old school man,” inviting the skeptics who rage against the Bible to please calmly consider the evidence, then try to mount a cogent refutation, hard to do as surely indicated, please read the material.

Who can know why pastors claiming to believe all the Bible ignore this resounding proof?  I guess you’ll have to ask them, it’s really a disgrace the way they ignore this information at the expense of their loyal and hungry congregations’ knowledge base about the Bible, not giving them many great reasons scientifically that all of the Bible is true!  Please boldly force the issue with your pastors, it’s only right, referrring them also to the Children’s Book at the foundation website which soon will be completed, great for the young and old, and those college students!