So you think Noah’s Flood which covered the earth is not real history? Checkout http://smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html, then ponder the title of the article “Dinosaur Shocker.” Now if the presence of soft cell tissue in dinosaur bones supposedly 65 million years old has not shaken the darwinists’ world, then why did the Smithsonian, lap dogs of darwinism, title the article Dinosaur Shocker? And is this and other such finds much discussed in our schools? Why is that? And since they’re talking about cloning wooly mammoth material, why not dinosaurs? Are they afraid that the public thinks about these things? Bank it.
The term dinosaur was not used until Sir Richard Owen coined it about two hundred years ago, throughout history ‘though those creatures known as dragons, but for darwinists to call those creatures in the fossil record dragons would be too much for them to bear, many of the bibliophobic scientists no doubt aware of the historical records concerning humankind’s encounters with dragons http://genesispark.com, for instance in the Bible dragons Behemoth in Uz (Uzbekistan) and Bel in the city of Babylon. See http://detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html) to note the fossil record caused by Noah’s Flood, and after the flood the history of the world here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.