Devil Satan What First Lie Deception Question Hath God Said Did Say Don’t Eat Fruit Every Tree Garden Eden Adam Eve Old Seed Doubt Confusion Word God Scripture Inerrancy Genesis History Slippery Slope Unbelief Literalism Faith Science Real Biblical History

April 29, 2012

Satan in the Garden of Eden asked “hath God said don’t eat the fruit from every tree in the Garden?”  Of course God had told Adam and Eve to eat only not of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil, so in a sense, Satan made that point, but with his cunning choice of words, he planted the seed that why should they not eat from that one tree when all the others were ok?  The Devil was suggesting that God couldn’t have meant that.

So from the beginning, Satan’s goal has been that humans doubt what God says in the Word, the rise (now fall) of darwinism a key tool in the Devil’s arsenal.  We’re not saying that darwinists are satanists (‘though undoubtedly some are), but darwinism has planted the seed of doubt, even “proving” that Genesis is not to be trusted authentic history, the Devil’s minions, out of loyalty to him or blind ignorance, saying of the book of Genesis, “surely God couldn’t have meant that.”

If Genesis is not real history, then where does real history begin to be recorded in the Bible?  Ask a christian old earth creationist that question, not letting them squirm off the hook, then watch their eyes glaze over in consternation, the slippery slope revealed.  For instance if Noah’s Flood as described in the Holy Bible is not real history, then many more than eight people would have survived whatever the limited flood which the old earth creationists attempt to rationalize, thus the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 would be just superfluous mythology.

Moses, the Apostle Paul, and many other great leaders in the Bible, not to mention the Messiah Jesus Christ himself, spoke of Genesis as undoubted history, so why would they lie about this unless they were minions of their avowed enemy the Devil?  It’s not as if there are not many great scientific reasons to believe all of the Bible, the problem seems to be that old earth creationists fear the confrontations inherent to true belief in all of the scriptures, and apparently too lazy or stubborn to learn the great reasons for it such as here

Bronze Ice Age Aqualithic Period Horse Drawn Chariots Trade Routes Sahara Desert Sahel Tracks Ruts Roads Berbers Garama Tassili N’ Ajjer Ahaggar Mountains Lake Tritonis Wadi Igharghar Fezzan Tafanasset North South Transit Gao Niger River

April 29, 2012

The darwinists’ tortured timeline for the history of the Sahara desert looks foolish considering the nearly one hundred ancient rock art works of horse drawn chariots found from Tunisia down to the Ahaggar mountians of southern Algeria then on down to Gao on the Niger River.

With ancient chariot trail ruts confirming that north-south transit across now one of the driest places on earth, the Sahara, the obvious conclusion is that the bronze age was the “aqualtihic period” of north Africa, when the wadis were rivers, such as the Igharghar from the Ahaggar mountains north to ice age Lake Tritonis (now the basin of the Great Eastern Erg).

And south from the Ahaggar mountains during the Ice Age (which was the bronze age) flowed the river Tafanasset, now a wadi, south down across what now is a sea of sand to the Niger river at Gao, the rockart along those chariot routes bearing testimony to the fact that the “aqualithic” was the bronze age in north Africa, when other works of rock art show hippos, crocodiles, elephants, and fishing where now are the parched and stark moonscapes of the Sahara.

Corraborative that the Ice Age began to end circa 1500 b.c. (timeframe of the Exodus) is that circa 1350 b.c., Jason and the Argonauts navigated and portaged portions of then diminishing Lake Tritonis, now the desert basin of the Great Eastern Erg, and camels came into vogue about a thousand years after that, by the time that the Sahara had become fully desert with just a few oasis between hundreds of miles of desert wasteland.  See much more here

Earth History Magnetic Stripes Field Strength Decline Rate Pole Shifts Geologic Record Predictions Polarity Reversals North South Axis Pole Alignment Minerals Sedimentary Igneous Rocks Strata Layers Young Old Earth Creationism Book Genesis Veracity Foundation

April 27, 2012

Almost one hundred ancient pole reversals of the earth’s magnetic field are indicated with the alignments of iron-rich minerals in the sedimentary rock layers of the so-called geologic column (which actually varies widely), with one reversal about every five-hundred thousand years (according to the mainstream uniformitarian geologic timeline), back to about 5 million years ago, and deeper in the geologic column, back to “600 million years ago,” one reversal every ten million years, yet mainstream geologists having no explanation for that change of frequency.

The earth’s magnetic field strength is rapidly declining, measured down 7% through the last 150 years, and magnetisation of iron-rich minerals in Roman pottery indicates the magnetic field strength 2,000 years ago was twice what it is today (conforming with the now measured decline rate), so how could the earth be billions of years old?

When you consider that ancient lava flows (such as from Steen Mountain) indicate reversals of the earth’s magnetic field during the time it took for those lavas to have cooled to rock, it’s obvious that the ancient reversals were rapid, during Noah’s Flood actually, the rapid sedimentation on the continents at that time thus proven with the model of runaway plate tectonics during Noah’s Flood explained here

And because the much greater magnetic field strength of the earth just four thousand years ago (perhaps four times what it is today) buffered the earth from cosmic rays which transform N14 to C14 in the atmosphere, carbon 14 dates from that timeframe are greatly exaggerated, in addition to that fact that much more volcanism during the Ice Age (which followed Noah’s Flood) diluted the C14/C12 ratio by carbon 12 in the CO2 gas which belched into the sky.  So clearly the biblical model fills the bill, darwinism and its timeline found greatly lacking once again, further demonstrated here

Historian Priest Manetho’s Egyptian Book Aegyptiaca Kings Pharohs List Age Sources Problems Accuracy Timeline Eras Dynasties Kingdoms Egypt Competition Antiquity Old History Herodotus Berosus Babylonian Rulers Earth Measures Genesis Veracity Foundation

April 27, 2012

At the time of greek rule in Egypt circa 200 b.c., about two hundred years after Herodotus had written his ancient history book of Greece and the world, the egyptian priest Manetho, not wanting Egypt to appear inferior, wrote his history Aegyptiaca, listing “dynasties” of the pharohs ostensibly dating back to Menes circa 3000 b.c., and the “time of the gods” before that, leading up to the founding of Egypt.

The imaginative Manetho wrote his list of kings sourced from oral legends and probably temple records, having compliled all that 2,000 years after the earliest kings actually lived, so upon that flimsy record (called by many such as scholar Sir James Breasted a farce in terms its purported antiquity and its failure to treat kings of the nomes of upper and lower Egypt rightly having lived comtemporaneously rather then consecutively), the darwinists base their contention that Manetho’s kings list proves the history of the book of Genesis false.

And Berosus the babylonian priest circa 200 b.c., not wanting to be outdone by Manetho and Herodotus, wrote the supposed timeline of ancient Mesopotamia too pre-dating the history of the post-Flood list of patriarchs in the Table of Nations of Genesis 10, recording too before those earliest monarchs of Mesopotamia the list of ten pre-Flood kings, ten of them, actually in line with the ten generations from Adam to Noah and the Flood in the Bible.

Yet rather than the 1,656 years from the six days of creation to Noah’s Flood indicated in the Bible, the babylonian Berosus wrote that the ten kings reigned a combined 432,000 years leading up to the global flood at the time of Utnapishtim, so how did he come up with that number?  It’s clearly poetic license from the ancient numbers of the mapping system used by the elites of all the ancient cultures, simply explained here, the science of the future, old school man.

What Was Language Writing System Atlantis Plato’s Atlantean Empire Ibero Basque Atlas Masif Libyco Berber Complex Phoenicians Punic Tifinagh Script Etymology Aqualithic Rockart Sahara Desert Climate Change Bronze Ice Age Genesis Veracity Foundation

April 26, 2012

Perplexing to afficianados of the mainstream ancient historical timeline for north Africa is that the Tifinagh writing script of the Berbers is etched on rockart now in the Sahara desert from the Aqualithic period (when there was very significant rainfall), showing humans there with hippos, aurochs, crocodiles, gazelles, and fishing, which was supposedly circa 7000 b.c., yet that writing script was first practiced they say circa 1000 b.c. in the region, a gaping 6,000 year hole in the darwinists’ chronology.

Tifinagh means language of the Punics, originally the mediterranean canaanite Phoenicians (finagh), namesake of the canaanite king Phoeniusa who lived circa 1500 b.c., yet mainstream historians misguidedly think that the language and writing script arrived with the founding of Carthage circa 1000 b.c., but there in the Sahara is that rockart from the aqualithic with Tifinagh etched in stone, some of that rockart too showing horse-drawn chariots, so they say that was from 7000 b.c?

The Berber language written in Tifinagh is part of the Ibero-Basque-Libyco-Berber language group, derivatives being the Basque language of Spain, the Berber spoken by the Guanches of the Canary Islands, and of course the Berbers of north Africa, so how could this be?  The language was that spoken by the archaic Atlanteans chronicled by greek Plato, of the Atlas mountain region, the letters Atl having meant water from Atlit Yam now submerged off the coast of Lebanon, to the Atlantic, all the way across to the Nahuatl spoken in Mexico, see, the science of the future, old school man.

Why Ancient Reason 600 Greek Feet Stadia Geometry 1,760 Yards British Mile 6,000 Olympic Standard 10 Stadion Nautical Metrics Key Atlantis Number Towers Seville Tarshish Tartessos Fortress History European Mathematics Astronomy Earth Measuring Systems

April 26, 2012

Isn’t it strange that there are 1,760 yards to a british mile?  Why is that?  The key is that 1,760 cubits compose the base-perimeter-length of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the relationship linked by the 176 towers with connecting walls which surrounded the ancient fortress of Tartessos, the site where now is the city of Seville, Spain, part of Atlantis.

Atlantis extended inside the Pillars of Hercules to Libya and Italy, so wrote Plato, and outside the Pillars (Gibraltar) as well, clearly all the way up to the valuable tin mines of Cornwall, England, the ancient map-making method explained here by which that special number 1,760 is memorialized in the number of yards composing the british mile.

And the ancient olympic foot unit of measure (12.16 modern inches) was probably the unit of measure in very ancient England when it was part of the Atlantean empire, during the Ice Age, this unit of measure also a subdivision of the radius length of the earth, the origin of our nautical mile mapping system, with 6,000 ancient olympic feet composing a nautical mile, 1/2 of that length the base-perimeter-length of the Great Pyramid of Giza.  Do you see the connection?

Submerged City Ruins Bronze Ice Age Pavlopetri BBC Elafonisos Island Greece Nic Flemming Documentary Ancient Peninsula Onou Gnathos Peloponnesos Nesos Word Meaning Etymology Atlantis Iberian Coastal Empires Mediterranean Sea Eastern Altantic Ocean

April 24, 2012

The ruins of the city called Pavlopetri, named after a nearby island, are submerged off the coast of another island nearby, Elafonisos, both islands off the coast of southeastern Greece in the Laconia district.  The roman historian Pausanias wrote that in very ancient times those islands were part of the greek mainland, a peninsula which was called Onou Gnathus, meaning donkey’s jawbone, apparently named for the unique outline of the peninsula, so clearly that city along with many others now submerged off the coast of Greece, such as at Psathoura, Abdera, Astakos, and Platygiali, were flooded when the sea level rose with the end the Ice Age.

Of course docmentarians such as Nic Flemming with the BBC, not publicly imagining that the Ice Age ended actually circa 1500 b.c. at the time of the Exodus, say that earthquakes caused the cities to have dropped into the sea, without historical records of such however, while in ancient greek legend is the Flood of Ogyges, a king who lived circa 1500 b.c., that flood also known as the Flood of Dardanus, having flooded much of Greece as the ancient story goes, this historical documentation ignored for obvious reasons by mainstream scientists.

When you consider the name for the greek mainland is Peloponnesos (named after king Pelops), a big peninsula jutting down from Europe, and that Plato called the geography of the empire of Atlantis a nesos, you can begin to see that the Iberian peninsula of Spain was the “island” empire of Atlantis, its coastal cities such as the City of Posidon, also known as the City of his son Atlas, now submerged off the coast of southern Spain, the capital city submerged probably thirty miles south of Cadiz.  Plato had the date wrong, that date of 9600 b.c. from the egyptian priests at Sais.

In the story, contradicting the 9600 b.c. date by a long shot, Plato wrote that trireme ships, bronze age weaponry, and city building were practiced by the seafarers of Atlantis, and he wrote that aegean kings from circa 1300 b.c., Erectheus, Cecrops, Theseus, and Erysichthon, lived in the timeframe that Altantis went under, failing ‘though to have mentioned the Flood at the time of Ogyges and Dardanus, so you can tell where the truth lies, with the biblical model of course!  So please now read much more here