Satan in the Garden of Eden asked “hath God said don’t eat the fruit from every tree in the Garden?” Of course God had told Adam and Eve to eat only not of the Tree of Knowledge of good and evil, so in a sense, Satan made that point, but with his cunning choice of words, he planted the seed that why should they not eat from that one tree when all the others were ok? The Devil was suggesting that God couldn’t have meant that.
So from the beginning, Satan’s goal has been that humans doubt what God says in the Word, the rise (now fall) of darwinism a key tool in the Devil’s arsenal. We’re not saying that darwinists are satanists (‘though undoubtedly some are), but darwinism has planted the seed of doubt, even “proving” that Genesis is not to be trusted authentic history, the Devil’s minions, out of loyalty to him or blind ignorance, saying of the book of Genesis, “surely God couldn’t have meant that.”
If Genesis is not real history, then where does real history begin to be recorded in the Bible? Ask a christian old earth creationist that question, not letting them squirm off the hook, then watch their eyes glaze over in consternation, the slippery slope revealed. For instance if Noah’s Flood as described in the Holy Bible is not real history, then many more than eight people would have survived whatever the limited flood which the old earth creationists attempt to rationalize, thus the Table of Nations in Genesis 10 would be just superfluous mythology.
Moses, the Apostle Paul, and many other great leaders in the Bible, not to mention the Messiah Jesus Christ himself, spoke of Genesis as undoubted history, so why would they lie about this unless they were minions of their avowed enemy the Devil? It’s not as if there are not many great scientific reasons to believe all of the Bible, the problem seems to be that old earth creationists fear the confrontations inherent to true belief in all of the scriptures, and apparently too lazy or stubborn to learn the great reasons for it such as here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.
Criticism Peer Review Process Analysis Biblical Young Earth Creationism Research Theory Papers Scientific Inquiry Books Bible Science Scientific Inquiry Ice Age Evolution Catastrophism Noah’s Flood Archaeology Languages Time Proofs Genesis Veracity Foundation
April 23, 2012Bibliophobic mainstream scientists mock young earth creationists’ for their lack of accepted “peer reviewed” research papers and scholarly works of theory, but of course, peer reviewed means by darwinists! So what are the odds of acceptance by that intellectually dishonest crew? Darwinists and uniformitarian geologists are instructed to not debate knowledgable young earth creationists, ostensibly because the biblical model does not deserve the time of day, but the real reason is that the mainstream scientists are embarrassed in such encounters, so who really has the monopoly on scientific truth?
Some issues of science are so obvious that any moron can see the truth of them, for instance that only a wamer ocean having been heated from below could have been the cause of the dense cloudcover for the Ice Age (think it through), yet mainstream scientists ignore this obvious fact of hydrology because they know that Noah’s Flood had caused that warmer ocean, Noah’s Flood which they say was impossible. Yet when you realize that the mountains rose at the close of the Flood, the geology all fits together, seeing information such as here http://globalflood.org.
If mainstream archaeologists and professors of ancient mathematics would have the courage and intellectual honesty to address this ancient mapping finding http://genesisveracityfoundation.com/earth-measure-geometry, they’d then be forced to admit that the cubit unit of length was earth commensurate, not the distance from some pharoh’s elbow to fingertip, clearly foolish in light of the finding in the link. So bring on the peer review, for to not do so is intellectually dishonest, hindering the furtherance of knowledge about the ancient world to the public.
And what about Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, treated as holy writ by mainstream science? About all you need to know is that Darwin’s term species is actually meaningless, because differing species can interbreed sometimes up to the family level on the phylogenetic tree, rendering the term species useless for meaningful animal classification by genetics. But the biblical model fills the bill, the term syngameons having classification value by genetics, such that only 20,000 syngameons of animals need have been on Noah’s Ark. Peer review anyone?