Darwinists Mainstream Science Claim Cult Cultish Status Biblical Belief Old Young Earth Creationism Organizations Answers Genesis Veracity Foundation Institute Creation Research New Frequently Asked Questions History Books Old Testament Facts Proofs Evidence Continuity Biblical Chronolgy Timeline

Darwinists moan and even shriek that proponents of biblical young earth creationism are cultish, foolishly believing what the darwnists’ science supposedly has thoroughly disproven, young earth creationists therefore fostering mere mythology on the gullible public, but who really are the fools in all this?

Anyone semi-knowledgable of the facts of hydrology knows that the Ice Age cloudcover, dense and global in nature (such for instance that the Sahara received much more rainfall at that time for the “aqualithc period”), must have been the result of much greater evaporation off the world’s bodies of water, most of that off the ocean, so obviously the ocean must have been heated from below, the result of the “fountains of the deep” having been the cause of Noah’s Flood.

Mainstream scientists can’t rationalize and so don’t want to talk about the submerged bronze age ruins, often sophisticated and megalithic, found on the shallow seafloor of the continental shelves in many parts of the world, proving that the Ice Age really ended circa 1500 b.c., so who is irrational in all this, since they say the Ice Age ended circa 10000 b.c.?

And since the mountains rose at the close of Noah’s Flood while the newly configured ocean basin sank to receive the water off the continents at the end of the Flood, does not the fossil record actually reflect that global catastrophe, seeing http://detectingdesign.com/fossilrecord.html?

Did you know that oil, coal, and diamonds show carbon 14 contents such that they must have been formed only thousands of years ago, seeing http://globalflood.org?  So what are the darwinists talking about?  Nonsense really, in light of all this evidence!

Because Darwin’s term species is meaningless (many species can interbreed), then does it not make much more sense to categorize animals by syngameons, interfertile types of animals?  And because certainly “dinosaurs” have been with us throughout human history, why should we doubt the genetic bottleneck of all creatures at Noah’s Flood, the animals which survived having naturally selected in new habitats of the post Deluge world?

What mainstream scientists really hate to discuss is that the ancients measured the earth by its wobble rate, such that they were able to navigate http://iceagecivilizations.com/articles/article02.htm all over the world during the Ice Age centuries which followed Noah’s Flood.  Seeing now please the big picture here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man!

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: