The darwinists’ uniformitarian geology scheme requires that geologic processes have been ongoing for hundreds of millions of years for the sedimentary layers to have built up on the continents by supposedly many trangressions of the ocean onto the continental landmasses, but what would cause the ocean to rise and cover much of the continents hundreds of times for the hundreds of sedimentary rock layers of typical geologic columns, many of the layers stacked like pancakes often covering vast portions of the continents? There really is no viable explanation for that scenario, just ask the uniformitarians.
So when you consider a watery catastrophe such as described in the Bible, legendary Noah’s Flood, and that the current mountain ranges such as the Himalayas need not have been covered because those our present mountain ranges rose at the close of the flood, then there now is your explanation for the sedimentary rock record with billions of creatures entombed as fossils there in sand and clay with limestone interspersed, sedimentary meaning laid down in water, the limestone precipates from a water solution, the sand and clay became sandstone and shale when the floodwater receded into the then deepening ocean basins.
But what of the radioisotope dating methods which say the geologic record is hundreds of millions of years old? Those dates are fully unreliable because they are based upon unknowable presuppositions:
Then now with those presumptions fully demonstrated baseless, and considering that carbon 14 with a half life of 5,000 years is measured in coal, oil, and diamonds, now see http://globalflood.org (all however supposedly in the millions of years of age according to the scheme of the uniformitarians), the global catastrophe which was Noah’s Flood now comes into focus having been certainly the cause of the geology which is observed today when honestly analyzed.
Yet what of the carbon 14 dates for organic material from ice age times, according to the uniformitarians which show those materials much older than the 6,000 years that the Bible indicates for the age of the earth? Of course at the close of the Flood, when the ice age began (the warmer ocean at the close of the flood the cause of the evaporation for the dense cloudcover then), volcanism was rampant in the aftermath of the runaway plate tectonics of the flood year, all the carbon 12 belching from those volcanos having diluted the carbon 14 in the environment then which cause dates from the ice age to be greatly exaggerated. It all fits the biblical scenario, while the darwinists’ scheme looks futile. And be sure to checkout http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.