The Science of the Future Old School Man Radio Ad Ending Motto Tag Line Audio Commercial Slogan Genesis Veracity Foundation Christian Young Earth Creationism Bible Apologetics Biblical Timeline Chronology Proofs Evidence Science Ice Age Atlantis Geology Archaeology Biology Evolution Archaic Reasons Believe Old Testament Literal Real History

December 31, 2011

Folks are beginning to search engine the ending slogan for the radio ads of the Genesis Veracity Foundation, “the science of the future, old school man;” very encouraging because it’s nice to have a motto which sticks in people’s heads and they seem to like, as has been indicated by many.  We hope that you refer your friends and associates to the foundation website (http://genesisveracityfoundation.com), to realize that biblical history and the science implied (if not flat-out indicated such as that only a warmer ocean after the fountains of the deep of Noah’s Flood could have been the engine for the ice age) truly is the science of the future, old school man.

Atlantis is explained as real history (see category here Atlantis Revealed) with the biblical chronology of events, people, and geography laid out in the Bible, in this case from the book of Genesis through the time of the Exodus when the ice age ended, having flooded Atlantis and caused the catastrophic climate change when the hebrews migrated out of Egypt, that climate change confirmed in the egyptian Ipuwer Papyrus, little discussed in mainstream circles because it confounds their timeline for the ice age, yet comporting with God’s Word that the earth and universe are about six thousand years old.

The honest skeptics ask why should you believe all of the Bible when its foundation the book of Genesis clearly written so blatantly contradicts what is taught in our schools about the ancient history of the human kind?  Well with the “science of the future,” Genesis is not to be doubted by any honest analysts, so take the time to peruse the material, it’s really irrefutable, the ancient history which Jesus when incarnated treated as the real deal, not some mythology conjured-up by sun-stroked iron age shepherds in Israel, what the darwinists would have you believe.  And checkout http://genesisveracity.com/Articles/Article13.htm, to see that all but the six days of creation was witnessed and recorded by humans in the book of Genesis, the foundational book of the Bible.


History Human Origins Hebrew Semitic Writing Script Language Toledot Proofs Meaning Words Etymology Dead Sea Scrolls Book Genesis Geneology Ancestries Bible Table Nations Proto Canaanite Alphabet Canaan Holy Land Distribution Phoenicians Phoenix Brother Cadmus Son Orpheus Aramaic Ketav Ashuri Aram Line Shem Dead Sea Scrolls Ketav Ivri Paleo Hebrew Proof Antiguity Torah Archaic Jewish Chronology Speaking Literature Biblical Old Testament Record Evidence

December 30, 2011

Bibliophobes stubbornly insist to say that “proto canaanite” was the first ancient writing script to utilize an alphabet, yet actually more ancient “paleo hebrew” writing used essentially the same letters of that alphabet (all consonants), dating far further back than the canaantie writing, proven by that all of the early portions of Genesis (long before Canaan lived), except the account of the six days of creation, were written by eyewitnesses (http://genesisveracity.com/Articles/Article13.htm), surely making it clear that Canaan learned the alphabet from his father Ham who was a son of Noah of true global flood fame.

Many of the Dead Sea Scrolls were copies of the book Genesis, those copies written circa 300 b.c. and thereafter, mostly in the “paleo hebrew” script, demonstrating that the content of the book of Genesis has not changed through millenia, so we can know that all of the Bible has not changed, the other books of the old testament represented in those Dead Sea Scrolls bearing testimony.  The aramaic language and script of Aram, a son of Shem, was mostly used to write the books of the Old Testament during the Second Temple period, after the conquered Jews had been taken to Babylon, then returned, yet the copies of the “proto hebrew” writing were maintained for posterity.

Of course the Phoenicans by led Cadmus and his brother Phoenix circa 1200 b.c. brought that alphabet to the people of the Mediterranean, the Greeks, Etruscans, and later the Latins, having added vowels for their applications of it to their languages, while all along it had been the Hebrews, named after Eber (six generation after Noah), who were responsible for carrying that writing scheme to the world, the Canaanites having merely borrowed it, then the Phoenicians, whose ancestry was mostly canaanite, distributed it by sea.  Read more about the post Flood world at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man.


Discovery Who First Discovered Mapped Continent Antarctica South America Forbidden History Ignored Censored Archaeology Science Math Stars Precession Method Astronomy Solution Cartography Anomalies Maps Ancient Sea Kings Charles Hapgood Piri Reis 1513 Oronteus Finaeus 1531 Graham Hancock Non Explanation Ice Age Mariners Voyages Across South Pole Atlantic Pacific Ocean Ships Travel Bronze Age Chaldean Babylonian Sexagesimal Number System Key Relationship Modern Solar Transit Time Nautical Mile Mapping Scheme Genesis Veracity Foundation

December 27, 2011

Those of the darwinian bent will tell you that the Russians in 1818 were the first to have discovered Antarctica, yet when you view the Oronteus Finaeus and Piri Reis maps, both drawn in the 1500’s from ancient source maps admitted by those medieval cartographers on the maps themselves, it’s obvious that mariners millenia before had voyaged across the south Pacific and Atlantic, seeing and mapping the coastline of Antarctica in the really great detail shown on the maps, unthinkable to the darwinists.

New Age devotees such as Graham Hancock say that the source maps for those Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings (in book form by Charles Hapgood) were indeed drawn during the ice age, which ended they say with their darwinist cohorts circa 10000 b.c., but of course sailing vessels for such voyages are not known to have been built ’til the 2000 b.c. timeframe, placing Hancock and co. in an intellectual and historical straightjacket, not reconcilable with their darwinian historical template, but real when one realizes that the ice age ended circa 1500 b.c., proven by the submerged “bronze age” ruins found in many parts of the world.

And those stubborn lemmings of status quo mainstream science have yet to acknowledge as fact the ancient mapping method which explains how the archaic mariners did it, having mapped much of the world accurately in ice age times and the centuries thereafter, laid out for you in article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com/article.html, largely ignored, probably because it was deduced by a young earth creationist, demonstrating that ET’s need not have done it, wishfully hypothesized by such as Hancock, and all flat-out ignored and avoided by the darwinists.  Read more here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future.


Critique Analysis Andrew Robinson Lost Languages Enigma World’s Undecifered Languages Kingdom Kush Ethiopia Name Etymology Origin Sudan Egypt Son Ityopis Ityopia Book Aksum Cush Table Nations Kushitic Linguistic Group Range Asia Africa Sons Biblical Cushites Nimrod India Ancestor Gods Seba Shiva Legends Geography Kish Mesopotamia Hindu Kush Mountains Tigris River Khuzistan Ancestries Archaic Bible Timeline Genesis Veracity Foundation

December 26, 2011

Mainstream ancient linguists say that the kingdom name Kush is of unknown origin, yet Kush was a son of the Ham in the Bible’s Table of Nations in Genesis 10, so you can see the bibliophobia oozing from their pores, in overt denial that the book of Genesis has any historical merit whatsoever, when but the history and names in the Bible are the key to unlocking the mysteries about ancient scripts and geographic regions, mysteries to such as Andrew Robinson who wrote Lost Languages: The Enigma of the World’s Undecifered Scripts, in which he indicates that the commonality of the naming of the Kusht river of Afghanistan, the Hindu Kush mountains of Pakistan, the city of Kish of ancient Mesopotamia (that region known as Khuzistan), and the kingdom of Kush south of Egypt, is mere coincidence, and the source of that name for those particular regions unknown in all cases.

The ancient greek historian Ephorus circa 340 b.c. wrote that the Kushites were both Asiatic and African, the Red Sea dividing them, connected by navigation, and Homer (circa 800 b.c.) then Herodotus (circa 440 b.c.) wrote that the Ethiopians (Cushites) lived in Egypt, Arabia, Palestine, western Asia (Mesopotamia) and India, so do Robinson and the others doubt this corroborative evidence too?  Yes indeed, for to think that an ancient tribe could have had that kind of far-reaching range is unthinkable to them, rendered true with the resettling of the world in the aftermath of Noah’s Flood (see http://genesisveracityfoundation.com), the template for the ancient migrations laid out in Genesis 10.

Ityopis was a son of Kush according to the Book of Aksum, Ityopia his kingdom, so clearly that son of Kush was the namesake of Ethiopia, one and the same as the ancient Kingdom of Kush of northeastern Africa which was centered at Meroe on the upper Nile in current day Sudan.  Other sons of Kush were Ramah of the Rama empire of India, and Seba later worshipped as the indian god Shiva, then there’s Nimrod, known to the Yoruba tribe of Nigeria as Lamurudu, and Nimrod a very popular name in Egypt circa 1000 b.c., so it’s obvious that those dark skinned people settled much of the ancient world, the sons of Ham having been great explorers as the Bible specifically indicates.


Plato’s Atlantis Spain Iberia Iberian Peninsula Bible Biblical Eber Table Nations Same Kingdom Ships Tarshish Timeline King Solomon Hiram Phoenician Navigators Ice Bronze Iron Age Atlantic Western Hemisphere Ocean Bimini Islands Bahama Banks Underwater Ruins Megaliths Maps Ancient Sea Kings Charles Hapgood Atlantean Mariners Cartography

December 25, 2011

The fascinating Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings compiled by Charles Hapgood in that great book have flummoxed mainstream scientists and historians for decades now; medieval maps drawn from very ancient source maps indicating that global navigators were plying the oceans of the world during the ice age, which is painfully unthinkable to ignorant mainstream academicians, so they really have no explanation for the “anomalous” maps, remaining all but silent on the subject, just ask them, then prepared to fill in the blanks for them with the groundbreaking information at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.

Refer to the Piri Reis map for instance, showing the shoreline of South America and Antarctica in remarkable detail, the very ancient source maps obvioulsy spliced together in ignorant style because the medieval navigators such as Piri Reis had never been there, only the ancient source maps in their possession to have been put together.  So who had really sailed initially to the south Atlantic to have drawn those coastlines in such great cartographic detail?

Plato wrote in his Atlantis story that the Mediterranean Sea was just a harbor compared to the great ocean beyond, the Atlantic, named after Atlas (a son of Posidon who was Sidon son of Canaan), and beyond it he wrote was a great contintent to which the Atlanteans had navigated.  There is the answer for the source maps of the ancient sea kings, they were Atlanteans, later known as Phoenicians, who after the ice age assisted the Hebrews from the time of the Judges through and past the time of King Solomon with the Ships Tarshish spoken of in the Bible.

Tarshish was later called Tartessos, a great mining kingdom of the ancient world, the Sierra Morena and Nevada mountains of southern Spain the source of those mineral riches, those the mountains to the north of the Atlantean plain of which Plato wrote.  Of course Tarshish was a great grandson of Noah in the Table of Nations in Genesis 10, and Eber of the line of Shem was the namesake of the Iberian Peninsula (what Plato called a nesos like the Peloponnesos), so the biblcial template provides all the answers, much to the darwinists’ chagrin.

The solving of this long-standing Atlantis mystery is a great key for global christian evangelism, demonstrating to the world that the Bible has all the answers, while the mainstream scientists are left gasping for breath with no answers at all.  Explainng too the submerged megalithic ruins on the Bahama Banks off Bimini and other islands there, the biblical template illustrates that those ruins were from ice age times, before the sea level rose to consume the city of Atlantis (now submerged about thirty miles south of Cadiz, Spain) and Atlantean outposts such as on the Bahama  Banks across Plato’s great western ocean, submerged since the end of the ice age circa 1500 b.c.


Plato’s Lies Disinformation Geography Island Nesos Atlantis Earthquake Flood Collapse Blocked Strait Ocean Passage Gibraltar Pillars Hercules Ice Bronze Iron Age Navigation Eastern Atlantic Iberia Greek Colonies Settlements Cities Towns Mainake Spain Tartessos Massalia Marseilles Phocaeans Greece Colonization Iberian Peninsula Word Meaning Nesos Etymology Critias Timaeus Books Coastal Ice Age Empire Biblical Timeline Genesis Veracity Foundation

December 23, 2011

Plato certianly lied when he wrote that the submergence of Atlantis had blocked the passage from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, that passage the Strait of Gibraltar, anciently known as the Pillars of Hercules, because Plato when writing circa 350 b.c. about Atlantis and its demise (with the end of the ice age) surely knew that greeks were colonizing all over the Iberian Peninsula (Spain) centuries before his time, from around 700 b.c. on up to and through his time, beginning with the report by Herodotus that the greek navigator Kolaios of Samos had sailed to Tartessos (the ruins of its capital now under Seville), and the founding of Mainake within the kingdom of Tartessos (named after the biblical Tarshish).

And phocaean Greeks founded Massalia (now Marseilles) on the french coast not far from Gibraltar circa 600 b.c, those greeks beyond doubt were knowledgable too that the Straits of Gibraltar were not blocked, and then they founded Nicaea, later known as Nice, named after the greek goddess Nike, and then Monoikos, now known as Monaco.  The greeks in that region were rivals of the Carthaginians of north Africa, who founded many cities west of Gibraltar, and conquered Tartessos circa 560 b.c., so we are to believe that the greeks really thought the Straits of Gibraltar were blocked at Plato’s time or ever?

Plato used the word nesos for both the ringed island city of Atlantis, half nautical mile in diameter (now submerged about 30 miles south of Cadiz), and for the greater coastal atlantean empire, commonly thought a bigger island, but it was really the Iberian (named after biblical Eber) peninsula, because the word nesos is in the ancient greek labeling for the balkan peninsula, the homeland of the greeks, the Peloponnesos, a peninsula, as was the heartland of the greater atlantean empire, the nesos of western Europe, the iberian peninsula, rendering it clear that Atlantis, complete with the biblical names associated with it, was an ice age empire, having been lost to the sea when the ice age ended, learn a great deal more here http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.


Animal Classification Systems Bible Science Embryo Development Growth Similar Analogous Analogy Darwinian Evolution Ernst Haeckel Fraud Forgeries Conviction Drawings Pictures Depictions Trial Jena University Art Ontogeny Recapitulates Phylogeny Charles Darwin Social Darwinism Engineering Racism Origin Species Label Homo Stupidus Descent Man Phylogenetic Tree Morphology Organisms Human Race Natural History Creation Books Ernst Haeckel Tadpoles Tails Survival Fittest Term Syngameons Meaning God Created Biblical Kinds Natural Selection Genesis Veracity Foundation Old Science Future Man

December 20, 2011

The german biologist and staunch advocate of ridiculous darwinism in the late 1800’s, Ernst Haeckel, foolishly proponed that the development of embryos is reminiscent of the darwinian evolution of the so-called species, for instance a frog embryo growing gradually to tadpole then to frog, this supposedly proof that fish-like creatures (the tadpole) had evolved into frogs over millions of years, nonsense still taught in many textbooks today.  Haeckel was convicted of fraud and forgery at Jena University for his trumped up drawings of the supposed transitional creatures, and Haeckel’s darwinian phylogenetic tree included homo stupidus (just below homo sapien), that’s right folks, homo stupidus, which he called “true but ignorant man!”  Do they tell you that in our halls of higher learning?  Haeckel wrote:

“A grim and ceaseless struggle for life is the real mainspring of the purposeless drama of world history.  We can only see a ‘moral order’ and ‘design’ in it when we ignore the triumph of immoral force and the aimless features of the organism.  Might goes before right as long as the organism exists.”  (Haeckel, The Evolution of Man, p. 88)

Charles Darwin in his book Descent of Man praised the work of Haeckel (homo stupidus and all!), adding to Haeckel’s social darwinism, that might is right, certainly license for racism and genocide in saying:

“With savages, the weak in body and mind are soon eliminated and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health.  We civilized men (and women), on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination, we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick . . .  thus the weak members of civilized societies propagate their kind.  No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man . . . hardly anyone is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals (homo stupidus?) to breed.”  (Darwin, Descent of Man, p. 501)

Darwinists today say that their “science” is not racist, but when you read the writings of Darwin and Haeckel (such as noted above), who can say that whomever are deemed to be the smartest and fittest should be the reproducers by social engineering (and genocide), according to darwinism, the others whom are not deemed superior left with no families nor even any life at all?  But the Bible, the Word, calls us the human kind, the human syngameon in modern biological parlance, all interfertile and so of one created kind, just as lions and tigers can breed, not “races” of cats, but members of one created syngameon, the biblical template rendering darwinism ridiculous and destructive.  Read more about the real history of ancient humankind at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, the science of the future, old school man.