If for no other reason to not believe old earth creationist Hugh Ross’s stance that Noah’s Flood was not as described in the book of Genesis, just consider that only a geothermally heated ocean in the aftermath of the fountains of the deep having been the source of the water for the global flood could have been the engine for the ice age. After all, for the dense cloudcover for the ice age, there must have been much greater rates of evaporation off the oceans for that massive cloud-buildup.
And when you consider that Ross still uses the biologically meaningless term species, you know he’s dodging the point that only about 20,000 syngameons of animals need have been on Noah’s Ark, not the millions of so-called species which Ross mockingly agrees with the darwinists would have to have been contained on Noah’s Ark.
Certainly the fact that Noah’s Ark was huge, as large as an oceanliner, which Ross apparently does not contest, further indicates that the flood was much more than just the swollen river or limited sea level rise which he says was Noah’s Flood, so he’s obviously painted himself into a corner, his science not at all comporting with the science of the Bible, which should lead one to ask Hugh, “then at what point in the Bible does real history begin to be recorded?”
The dimensions of Noah’s Ark were denominated in cubits, the ancient universal measure used from ancient China to atlantean Spain, and to Mexico (the hunab of the ancient Olmecs exactly twice the length or the royal cubit), that unit length earth commensurate, a subdivision of the radius length of the earth (article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com), all these fact ignored by Hugh Ross because they prove young earth creationism valid, read more at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.