Importance Prophetic Relevance Scriptures Prophecy As It Was Days Noah’s Flood Like Will Shall Be When Son Man Jesus Christ Appears Returns Matthew 24: 37 Passage Luke 17: 26 Falling Away Unbelief Heaven Hell Bible Biblical Prophecies Endtimes Tribulation Rapture Believers Elect Verses New Old Testament Eternal Truths Evidence Young Earth Creationism Chronology History Proofs Website Genesis Veracity Foundation Motto Science Future Old School Man

November 30, 2011

In the New Testament of the Bible, the Word (Jesus Christ) says that when the Messiah returns, it shall be as it was in the days of Noah, when all but the elect were doomed to destruction.

In Noah’s day, the unbelievers laughed and mocked his prophecy brought to him by Elohim that the world would be destroyed by a flood, like today, the unbelieving world laughs and mocks at the prophecied rapture of the believers yet to come.

So since much of christendom laughs and mocks the notion that Noah’s Flood was real history, described in the book of Genesis, having covered the entire world killing all those not on Noah’s Ark, then how can those self-professed christians today believe that the rapture of true believers will likewise occur, “just as in the days of Noah so shall it be when the Son of Man appears?”

If Noah’s Flood did not destroy all but the true believers, God not meaning what is clearly written in Genesis, then why believe the prophecy of the rapture, right?  Why believe any of it at all?

Prophetic scripture as well as ancient prophecy fulfilled to be realized ancient history must be taken literally lest all of the Bible be seen as just imaginations of sun-stroked iron age shepherds in the middle east.  In other words, if Genesis is not true, then why believe the rest of the Bible?

This is the strategy of the christophobic biblical skeptics, to try to prove that Genesis is not real history, so therefore the rest of the Bible is just nonsense too.  So counter their vain imaginations with material from such as the informative http://genesisveracityfoundation.com; the science certainly of the future, old school man.


Young Old Earth Creationism Creationists Debate Age Earth Universe Controversy Importance Relevance Global Evangelism Hugh Ross Reasons Believe Genesis Veracity Foundation World Views What Would Jesus Say Chronology Bible Literalism Real Noah’s Flood Ark Dimensions Size Earth Commensurate Royal Cubits Units Lengths Measures Ice Age Civilizations

November 30, 2011

If for no other reason to not believe old earth creationist Hugh Ross’s stance that Noah’s Flood was not as described in the book of Genesis, just consider that only a geothermally heated ocean in the aftermath of the fountains of the deep having been the source of the water for the global flood could have been the engine for the ice age.  After all, for the dense cloudcover for the ice age, there must have been much greater rates of evaporation off the oceans for that massive cloud-buildup.

And when you consider that Ross still uses the biologically meaningless term species, you know he’s dodging the point that only about 20,000 syngameons of animals need have been on Noah’s Ark, not the millions of so-called species which Ross mockingly agrees with the darwinists would have to have been contained on Noah’s Ark.

Certainly the fact that Noah’s Ark was huge, as large as an oceanliner, which Ross apparently does not contest, further indicates that the flood was much more than just the swollen river or limited sea level rise which he says was Noah’s Flood, so he’s obviously painted himself into a corner, his science not at all comporting with the science of the Bible, which should lead one to ask Hugh, “then at what point in the Bible does real history begin to be recorded?”

The dimensions of Noah’s Ark were denominated in cubits, the ancient universal measure used  from ancient China to atlantean Spain, and to Mexico (the hunab of the ancient Olmecs exactly twice the length or the royal cubit), that unit length earth commensurate, a subdivision of the radius length of the earth (article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com), all these fact ignored by Hugh Ross because they prove young earth creationism valid, read more at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.


Historical Evidence Date Time End Ice Age Geography Place Names Kings Greece Sea Level Rise Timeline Flood Ogyges Dardanus Atlantis Aegean Rulers Plato’s Critias Timaeus Dialogues Bronze Age Greek Kings Erysichthon Erectheus Cecrops Theseus Chronology Link Legends Myths Real Events Book Bible Genesis Veracity Foundation Eusebius Moses Climate Change

November 30, 2011

Plato wrote in his famous dialogues with Critias and Timaeus that large bronze age trireme ships plied the oceans of the world from the ports of Atlantis, yet he reported that was over 9,000 years before his time, so clearly he was either deceived by Solon’s story from the egyptian priests at Sais about the atlantean chronology, or he had merely ignored the other evidence within his own writing also in Critias and Timaeus that the sea level rise which consumed Atlantis and much of Greece was at the end of the bronze age, Plato havng written that was in the general timeframe of the legendary and truly historical aegean kings Cecrops, Erysichthon, Erechtheus, and Theseus, known to have lived circa 1400 b.c.

And because the pelasgian king Ogyges, namesake of the legendary Ogygian Flood (reputed to have consumed much of Greece), according to ancient greek chronologies, lived circa 1500 b.c., you must certainly wonder what motivated Plato not to have equated this flood with the flooding of the Atlantean Empire (which he said stretched to Italy and Egypt), clearly the world ocean risen hundreds of feet, and certainly not 9,000 years before Plato’s time, per his own contradictory words.

The early christian chronicler Eusebius wrote that the flood of Ogyges was at the time of the Exodus of the hebrews out of Egypt, and the pelasgian king Dardanus who lived circa 1400 b.c. was the historic namesake of the Dardanelles strait which has connected the world ocean to the Black Sea ever since the end of the ice age, so Plato absolutely and willfully allowed the egyptian priest’s distortion about the timeline for the submergence of Atlantis, that legend therefore justifiably deemed impossible by modern archaeologists because bronze age technologies and navigation were certainly not practiced 9,000 years before Plato’s time.  Be sure to read more about the efficacy of the Atlantis legend (when its timeline is rightly rectified) at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, and tell your friends, professors too, see what they say.


Origins Species Book Genesis Bible Created Kinds Hybrids Hybridization Syngameons Classification Systems Darwinism Charles Darwin Inverted Tree Life Common Descent Scientific Problems Genetic Drift Gene Pool Variation Evidence Survival Fittest Natural Selection After Noah’s Global Flood Ice Age Animals Civilizations Timeline Genesis Veracity Foundation

November 30, 2011

Why do the bibliophobic darwinists insist that their classificaton term species actually has genetic classification value?  It’s because that if they’d admit the great hybridizing potential among many species, such as among llamas, alpacas, and camels, the darwinists then would have to admit that only about 20.000 syngameons (not species) of animals need have been on Noah’s Ark.

So when you then consider that Noah’s Flood did not cover the current mountain ranges because those ranges rose through the receding flood waters at the close of the flood (see http://globalflood.org), the whole darwinian timeline is exploded, as the radioisotope dating methods are greatly flawed, with “good readings” deemed to be only those matching the darwinists’ timeline, and not mentioned either that coal, diamonds, and oil contain significant amounts of carbon 14 proving that they are only thousands of years of age.

Hard to imagine for many is that the book of Genesis in the Bible is real history, yet Jesus Christ himself certainly indicated that the people, events (such as Noah’s Flood) and timeline of Genesis is absolutely reliable history, but millions of self-professed christians seem to be calling Jesus a liar in their ignorant disbelief of Genesis history, which obviously plays into the hands of the bibliophobes who would have all believe that Genesis is nonsense, and therefore, that the rest of the Bible should logically not be believed either?

See more proof at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, and please refer it to those skeptics of Genesis you know, bibliophobic darwinsists and self-professed christians who are underming the belief by others in the Bible through their ignorance of the fact that Genesis is real history to believe, as is the rest of the Bible.


Sons Poseidon Clito Twin Brothers Atlas Kings Ten Given Districts Regions Island Atlantis Spain Iberian Peninsula Atlantean Plain Rivers Location Geography Cadiz Gades Gadira Gadirus Key Mystery Ice Age Coastline Maritime Empire Evidence Proofs Young Earth Creationism Genesis Veracity Foundation

November 28, 2011

Where was Atlantis?  Plato in his dialogue with Critias gives a great hint (among many).  He wrote that the region of Cadiz, Spain, was given to Gades, the twin brother of Atlas, Gades or Gadirus given “the cape of the island facing the Pillars of Hercules,” that is Gibraltar.  Atlas (namesake of the Atlantic, the Atlas Mountains, and Atlas books of Maps see article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com) was given the circular island city of that Atlantean region now submerged about thirty miles south of Cadiz on the continental shelf, submerged since the end of the ice age, so when really did those legendary kings live?

Plato wrote of the trireme ships and bronze age metallurgy sourced by the rich mining district (the still productive Rio Tinto ore district of the Sierra Morena mountains to the north of the circular city of Atlantis and the atlantean plain), and “sea god” Poseidon, the father of Atlas and Gades, was really the biblical Sidon, son of Canaan, so the biblical timeline fits this scenario, the ice age having ended actually circa 1500 b.c. at the time of the Exodus of the jews out of Egypt, confirmed by the submerged bronze age ruins found in many parts of the world and the catastrophic climate change to deserts now realized to have drastically change the ancient landscape of such as Egypt.

Other hints for the location of Atlantis given by Plato in his dialouge with Critias are that another son of Posidon, Elasippus, was the namesake of ancient Olisippos, now known as Lisbon, Portugal, and son Azaes may well have been the namesake of the Azore islands, so when you link these facts with another son, Mneseas (Menes?), probably the namesake of Menouthis, now submerged along the extinct Canopic branch of the Nile off the coast of Egypt near Alexandria, that the Atlantean empire extended from Gibraltar to Egypt and Italy is proven by archaeological fact.  Learn more about all this at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.


Biblical Genesis Literalism Open Letter Plea Pastors Preachers Evangelists United States America Young Earth Creationism Global Evangelism Timely Sermons Key Evangelization Science Rational Skeptics Book Genesis How Counter Darwinism Evolution Big Bang Billion Years Earth Universe Real History Atlantis Facts Ice Age Problem Noah’s Ark Viability Historicity Proofs Evidence Origins Genesis Veracity Foundation

November 26, 2011

Dear christian Pastor/Evangelist,

While the secular academic world still openly mocks the book of Genesis, laughing for instance that Noah’s Flood must have covered the Himalaya mountains with millions of animal species housed on the Ark (both notions demonstrably false), the vast majority of pastors in America passively sit by smiling meekly preaching to generously give as it shall be given unto them, admonishing their listening flocks to be salt and light in the world, yet hiding in fear of discussing what really is true history in the book of Genesis, after all, the foundational book of the Bible, this none can deny, including the scientific skeptics of course who see it as the achilles heel of christianity, its weakness to be exploited scientifically.

If you can’t believe the book of Genesis, then why believe the rest of the Bible, doesn’t that make sense?  And if the early portions in the book of Genesis are scientifically and archaeologically unbelievable, then where does real history begin to be recorded in the Bible?  Since Noah’s Flood with the genetic bottleneck of the eight humans (and thousands of biblical kinds or syngameons of animals) supposedly is not real history, then the Table of Nations in Genesis 10, the progenies of the eight on the Ark, the tribes which spread out over the world after the Flood, is a laughable historical record too, is that not logical?

The slippery slope is obvious that if you can’t believe Genesis, then why believe that the ancestral line of Jesus Christ the Messiah had come down from Heber (father of the hebrews) who was but six generations from Noah?  The skeptics and christophobes know that when the veracity of Genesis is undermined, then the rest of the Bible falls like a house of cards, so pastor, preacher, global evangelist on tv, why do you put up with that when a multitude of evidences confirming the early history in the Bible are at your fingertips at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com to confound the mocking skeptics whom now ‘though can be evangelized?


Extent Geography Atlantis Plato’s Book Dialogues Timaeus Solon Atlantean Empire Across Western Ocean Continent Americas Surrounds Atlantic Archaic Mediterranean Sea Straits Gibraltar Pillars Hercules Inside Egypt Libya Italy Atlas Maps Sea Kings Ice Age Cartography Proofs Atlantean Ships Shipping Trading Navigation Bible Genesis Veracity Foundation

November 25, 2011

Of course the ancient phoenicians knew that the Strait of Gibraltar was not obstructed when Atlantis went under, as they aggressively plied the waters of the Atlantic ocean from the Mediterranean sea to even the Americas (search engine Phoenicians Evidence Americas) during the iron and bronze age (which was the ice age), the myth of the obstruction of the strait perpetrated by the phoenicians and their allies to protect their monopoly of the shipping and trade lanes to the west.  And reading Plato’s dialogue with Timaeus, you can see that many at that classical Greek time were aware of the Americas, no doubt learned from the phoenicians.  This from Timaeus about the western ocean:

Reference from Plato’s Timaeus:  “From those islands (Canaries and Teneriffes) one could then travel to the entire continent on the other side, which surrounds the real sea beyond.  Everything here inside the strait (Gibraltar or Pillars of Hercules) we’re talking about seems nothing but a harbor (Mediterranean) with a narrow entrance (Strait of Gibraltar), whereas that really is an ocean out there and the land that embraces it all the way around truly deserves to be called a continent.”

So considering the ancient mapping method explained in article #2 at http://iceagecivilizations.com, could it be more obvious that Christopher Columbus was certainly not the first to have travelled to the Americas by sea?  After all, with the Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings (Hapgood), which are medeival maps sourced from ancient and often ice age maps based on the rate-of-the-earth’s precession mapping method (explained in the link), it’s obvious that the Americas were mapped over three thousand years before Columbus.  And so why is this not discussed in our schools?  It’s because it helps definitively shatter the darwinian paradigm, and lends much credence to the young earth creationism model, details about which you can study further at http://genesisveracityfoundation.com.