Rolling Stone reporter Michael Hastings, a typical progressive liberal writing for that magazine, with his reportage of General McCrystal and his mates speaking ill of Team Obama’s military capabilities and goals, apparently did not know that McCrystal actually fell on his sword of his own volition, to let the world know that the u.s. military (by and large) doesn’t like the way Team Obama is handling things. And McCrystal himself, from what I have read, is a social liberal, however, fiscally, I don’t know where he stands, but with some military brass now saying our national debt is one of the biggest threats to America, I’d certainly bet that McCrystal agrees with this assessment, so surely, Mcrystal and millions of usually democrat voting Americans like him will be lining up to vote-out Obama, as Hastings and the Rolling Stone see the boomerang come back on them too fast to handle.
Political Logic Reason Stanley McCrystal Exposure Military Distrust Barack Hussein Obama Rolling Stone Article Writer Michael Hastings Hit Piece Backfires Progressive Islamic Jihad Politically Liberal General Stanley McCrystal Rationale Sounding Alarm AmericaJune 26, 2010
Wiley Political Strategist General Stanley Stan McChrystal Run Presidency 2012 Republicans Race Serious Defense Offense Against Radical Islam Jihadis Rolling Stone Article Smokescreen Strategy Message to Americans Team Barack Hussein Obama Endangers United States Sovereignty National Borders Defense Cooperation Israeli Survival Middle East PoliticsJune 23, 2010
Does anybody seriously think that special ops master General Stanley McCrystal didn’t know what he was doing when he ok’d the Rolling Stone reporter be privy to the disrespectful smack which he and his compadres were running against Team Obama while the reporter listened following them around in Europe? Do many people really think McCrystal didn’t realize he would be speaking to millions of young rockers who love this country very much and are likely potential enlistees by allowing these intriguing comments for public consumption about Team Obama’s impotence against islamic jihad? And in so doing, could this not be a rallying cry to follow him to the presidency in 2012?
And with millions of the youth of America losing jobs to illegal aliens, secure borders are also of great interest to the readers of Rolling Stone, right in McCrystal’s wheelhouse, who is a great speaker too, so now that he’s out of command in Afghanistan, look for great support for his candidacy for a run for president in 2012, paired perhaps with Chris Christie or Sarah Palin, sure to engender much fervent backing by the previously silent majority, while the democrats watch the tidal wave approaching them this fall, the left wing unwilling to secure our borders nor effectively battle islamic jihad intellectually and militarily.
General Stanley McChrystal for President 2012 Republican Ticket Nomination Frontrunners Sarah Palin Feud Barack Obama Recalls American War Hero Special Ops General McCrystal Afganistan Resignation Foreign Policy Disputes Defense Cooperation Nation State Israel Key Military Morale United States Natural National Bond Jewish People Middle East PolicyJune 23, 2010
With Stanley McChrystal basically challenging president Obama to fire him, probably ‘though with resignation in hand when they meet today, the general stands poised for a momentous run at the republican nomination for the presidency in 2012, perhaps paired with Sarah Palin, another populist folk hero, this pair who would return Israel to its rightful place of respect in our foreign policy, that nation our only ally in the Middle East against islamic jihad which seeks to obliterate Israel and the West.
McChrystal would push for free speech in the bigoted Middle East, challenging those nations to engage in intellectual discourse with debates of comparative religion, to talk not fight, which should be just fine if-in-fact Islam is truly the religion of peace, right? And why should not the ardent proponents of Islam be willing to debate the merits of their books, the Koran and Hadith, with the history and claims in the Bible, both old and new Testaments, if ostensibly the islamic books are later and more accurate revelations?
Dinosaurs Dragons Bible References Atlantis Genesis Biblical History Confusion Evidence Noah’s Flood Mount Ararat Information Analysis Search Discovery Young Earth Creationism Atlantean Studies Biblical Explanation Tarshish Spain Atlas Mountains Gibraltar Dancing from Genesis Geology James I. NienhuisJune 23, 2010
Is Atlantis mentioned in the Bible? Yes, but not directly, because Tarshish (Spain) was presented as the preeminent maritime empire during the time of the Judges circa 1200 b.c.; this Tarshish who was a son of Javan, the greek Iawan (the namesake actually of the Ionians of Greece), lived during the Ice Age, just a few generations from Noah obviously (see the Table of Nations in Genesis).
So as the biblical Tarshish, known later to the Romans as Tartessos, was the chosen name of those who remained there in the Gibraltar region after the Ice Age had ended (when the City of Atlantis and others worldwide succumbed to the sea), and as that great historical maritime empire of the bronze age western Mediterranean and eastern Atlantic (and around the world) is not mentioned in the Bible after Genesis 10 until the Book of Judges over a thousand years later, we must fill in the blanks about Atlantis through deductive reasoning of the evidence.
Many who have not studied the book of Genesis and science say Noah’s Flood and the flood of Atlantis must have been the same, at the end of the Ice Age, but with the remains of the legendary Ark of Noah now discovered high on Mount Ararat at 13,000 feet, and those remains far too extensive and partially covered with rock and ice to have been planted when you take a good look http://NoahsArkSearch.net/eng, the world can now see that Noah’s Flood was the real deal, with the geology supporting this notion (refer often to http://GlobalFlood.org).
So there really is no excuse to not believe the veracity of Genesis after you checkout http://GenesisPark.org/genpark/thedino/thedino.htm, great material to run by your pastor who probably hasn’t thought about this stuff in years, so let him/her be the judge, should be interesting, see http://genesisveracityfoundation.com, and listen please for more here http://jamesnienhuisradio.com.
Barack Obama Oil Spill Caper George Soros John Podesta Brother Tony Lobbyist BP British Petroleum Democrat Campaign Machine Petrobras Oil Company Brazil Deepwater Drilling Gulf Mexico Continues Offshore Oil Disaster Obama Plan Cripples Domestic Exploration Production Drill Here Drill NowJune 21, 2010
George Soros (who sounds like Boris Badinoff of the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon), fiendish global progressive of gargantuan proportions and big backer of Obama, owns almost a billion dollars worth of Petrobras (the brazilian national oil company) stock, its value sure to rise much further now that Obama has effectively shut down american offshore drilling because of the horrific oil spill, with but Petrobras still gleefully drilling away in the Gulf of Mexico all the ‘while, and last year having received a more-than-strange two billion dollar cash transfer from the administration of Team Obama, a motley crew.
And since Obama insider John Podesta’s brother Tony is a big lobbyist for British Petroleum, surely the understanding has been transmitted that BP will come out of this disaster smelling like a rose, no doubt to be rewarded by Team Obama, which is led really by John Podesta, with perhaps future deals, directly or indirectly, with Soros’ Petrobras to reward BP for essentially playing along, in order to cripple our u.s. domestic production, well mission accomplished for now, but we’ll see how Obama does in 2012, when the public will have realized the president waited over two months to begin to collect the spewing oil at sea with huge specially fitted tankers available.