Intelligent Design Creationism Sarah Palin Says She’s Open to Creation Science being Taught Alongside with Darwin’s Theory of Gradual Evolution and Uniformitarian Geology not Etched in Stone in Public Schools Catastrophism in Geology Apparently Realized and Understood by Sarah Palin Advocates Intellectual Honesty in the Classroom Biblical Creationism is not Scientific Says Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled in 1987 that “scientific creationism” can be taught in public schools, the distinction being with “biblical creationism,” which the Court said is religion, not science, when in reality, it’s silly to separate the two, because after all, “scientific” creationism explores the evidence of a creator, and so too does “biblical” creationism, so there is no difference, except in the minds of the Justices who didn’t want anything biblical discussed in the “scientific” creationism discussions in public schools, which obviously is absurd, because it is from the Torah of the Old Testament that western civilization obtained its concept of creationism, so in denying that scientific and biblical creationism are actually one in the same, the Court denies the history of western thought, with the Bible preeminent in legal, religious, political, and educational institutions, acknowledging the western tradtion that the Bible is historically accurate.

So since the Court saw that there’s plenty of evidence for “scientific” creationism to legitimately be taught in public schools, Sarah Palin says she’s certainly open to this, having taught her kids creation science herself as she assisted in their education, seeing the merit of the creationism model, seeing the obvious intelligent design in nature, and willing to look at the evidences in geology and biology which indicate ancient earth history quite different than what is taught exclusively now in the public schools, that the vast sedimentary layers of rock we see up on the continents were put there by water, but by many encroachments of the ocean onto the continents (which actually can’t be explained geophysically), and that primordial goo morphed into humans over hundreds of millions of years, which is laughably considered fact by the darwinists who dominate the teaching in our public schools.

So in debating the merits of catastrophic versus uniformitarian geology, and the scientific legitimacy of the use of the term syngameon, rather than species, in the analysis of the genetic boundaries between kinds of animals, intellectual honest is brought to bear, which I thought is one of the trademarks of a quality education, which is now being denied public school students, because the darwinists are afraid to compete against the creation science model, for good reason, they always lose in debates.

And if you’d like to see how the ancients used the intelligent design of the universe to measure and map the earth, see article #2 at http://IceAgeCivilizations.com, the method by which the ancients established the lenght of the royal cubit, and the olympic foot, as you will see when you read under category Ancient Navigation.  To learn the evidences for biblical (and scientific) creationism, checkout the free ebook download of my first book Old Earth? Why Not!, showing that the evidences found in nature really do lend themselves to the veracity of the Genesis account, the foundation of scientific creationism.